tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23426297.post4449600132097440164..comments2023-10-31T09:19:37.899-04:00Comments on My Three Cents: The 4th amendment's last standclammychttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00680889340781216855noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23426297.post-76772762860753558512007-08-31T10:39:00.000-04:002007-08-31T10:39:00.000-04:00BTW, great post Clammyc!BTW, great post Clammyc!Ulysseshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05763975139445755569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23426297.post-62541880482223897122007-08-30T21:09:00.000-04:002007-08-30T21:09:00.000-04:00Anonymous-- maybe the text of the actual 4th Amend...Anonymous-- maybe the text of the actual 4th Amendment would be helpful to you, since you apparently forgot to read it:<BR/><BR/>"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." <BR/><BR/>The Bill of Rights, including this 4th Amendment, was ratified in 1791. The Miranda decisions were rendered by our Supreme Court in 1966. So, as most Americans with an 8th grade education know-- our search warrant rights had been enjoyed by U.S. citizens for 175 years before the Miranda decisions.<BR/><BR/>Your nonsense about Reno doesn't even merit a response.Ulysseshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05763975139445755569noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23426297.post-2472806143202645652007-08-16T12:25:00.000-04:002007-08-16T12:25:00.000-04:00There is a much juriprudence on the 4th Amendment ...There is a much juriprudence on the 4th Amendment and apparently you forgot to read it. It was not until the Miranda decisions that U.S. citizens were even provided with things like a search warrant right. Many legal scholars continue to question the validity of these cases. Finally, the 4th Amendment and the privileges of the U.S. Constitution only applies to U.S. citizens, non-citizens to which the spying operations have been applied. <BR/><BR/>Should it surprise me that the Left wants to expand Constitutional protections to those who are not even entitled to them such as international terrorists?<BR/><BR/>I have had enough of these claims of Constitutional violations from those who have never read it or understand the Constitution. <BR/><BR/>Finally, shut up already about Gonzalez. Where were you when Janet Reno was using the Justice Department as a vehicle to cover-up the campaign finance abuses that occurred during the Boy President's failed reign. He even took money from Enron, which was propped up by corrupt business cronies in the accounting industry.<BR/><BR/>ManiacAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com